这是欧盟的出口业务的更好或更困难，从而彻底结束？贾七肮焦急等待结果。
“的初步结果日落复审今年10月进行。” 9月3日，厦门电子有限公司董事总经理林告诉记者贾期肮从7月20日开始，在中国与能源欧盟节能灯行业五年反倾销调查，欧盟贸易委员会对中国的能源发起节能灯行业的“日落复审”。
所谓的“日落复审”是负责反倾销后，5年届满的职责产品进行行政复议，“日落复审”将决定到生效的反倾销是继续或终止。贾七肮
，作为能源等候结果相同的节能灯有很多国内制造商，“有几十个供应商提交了调查问卷的审查，”机电产品进出口商会法律部告诉记者，利益相关者。
的检讨结果，贾七昂不是很乐观，因为“西门子子公司欧司朗的态度仍然很强硬。”但我希望还存在，“由于飞利浦继续明确表示反对中国的能源推广节能灯的反倾销调查，欧盟内部分裂，可有机会举办中国制造商。”贾期昂说。
西门子集团是通用电气灯力阻中国
说：“现在{zd0}的障碍是欧司朗的态度。”贾七肮告诉记者，据他了解，在这个夕阳审查，西门子集团已明确表示，中国制造商继续进行反倾销诉讼。
欧司朗是西门子集团的重要成员，是世界三大电光源的主要制造商。记者掌握的内部资料显示，世界上三个{zd0}的节能灯企业通用电气还增加了西门子公司和欧司朗的行列，与一名游说集团“2CFLI组织在一起”。今年7月的游说组织在伦敦举行会议，协调行动，并共同向欧盟委员会要求在中国的能源推广节能灯行业，反倾销调查。
“夕阳的{zh1}审查后，通常会在公告发出后，每年15-21天内，应诉企业市场经济地位的40天内完成对倾销填写问卷调查表保证金，然后对这些问卷收集欧洲委员会组织核查，其次是初裁，{zh1}的决赛。“隆安律师事务所深圳办事处主任贾红卫律师说。
的“中国的能源日落复审节能灯企业可能是一个机会，复苏，但没有在中国制造商的手中。该倡议的手” 9月1日，中国照明电器协会陈燕生告诉记者。
“中国的节能灯的生产能力占全球百分之八十的份额。”陈燕生透露，2005年中国的能源出口节能灯约800亿美元，但对欧盟出口了130亿美元美元。庞大的欧盟市场基本上仍然处于欧司朗，飞利浦和其他公司手中的手中。
现在，在中国机电产品进出口商会的组织已经有几十能源的节能灯企业在中国已决定参加日落复审。陈燕生在中国照明电器协会，还与供应商的工作的沟通。在贾七昂，中国制造商欧司朗
无力阻止目前的态度，他说：“我们没有办法这样做。”让贾期肮更生气的是，在欧洲“欧司朗方阻止，而在中国市场上没有任何大的这次比赛规模扩大，阻碍中国企业是不公平的。”
“这是5年来，我们公司对欧盟出口下降了百分之九十。“贾七肮说，但阻止在同时中国制造商欧司朗在中国是强大的，甚至一家公司联合收购香港中国第二大佛山照明13.47％的股份，灯泡生产厂商。飞利浦
游说欧盟反倾销撤销
说：“日落复审是在欧洲联盟的强大的因素也开始出现不同的意见，”陈燕生告诉记者，“飞利浦游说更有利于中国制造商。”
事实上，作为世界上{zd0}的制造商节能灯，飞利浦已成为反倾销诉讼“受害者”，因为他们的灯光，已基本生产基地转移到中国-在欧洲，飞利浦只在波兰保留了一个能源服务节能灯厂，主要生产xx节能灯。除飞利浦亚明照明有限公司上海，在中国能源飞利浦节能灯出口到欧盟市场时，同样的反倾销税的罚款。节能灯在欧洲市场，目前，飞利浦是大约35名在许多产品的销售收入市场份额，必须从中国进口。
从欧洲反倾销的企业上“，是为了保护自己的利益，但消费者来说，你应该让消费者有权利享受这些谁是最廉价，xxx的产品，这是不可阻挡的的趋势。“艾马希在专访记者，飞利浦照明公司总经理说，如果中国的能源取消节能灯行业征收反倾销税，中国廉价的优质节能灯产品，欧洲消费者将更多地利用节能灯，节能灯，以使整个行业。飞利浦
声明，欧盟委员会提供的数据显示，在过去5年来，我国节能灯行业的反倾销调查，欧盟内部节能灯价格上涨了百分之二十五，“限制价格，增加市民的购买力，降低对环境的保护市场。“飞利浦强调。
艾马希，向记者透露任何重大的政策之前，欧盟，我们必须听取业界的意见，特别是一些大公司的看法，飞利浦将利用这个机会游说欧洲联盟。
作为回应，欧盟贸易专员曼德尔森公开表示，如果实施反倾销，对环境恶化的结果，应避免中国的能源推广节能灯的反倾销税。 06.9.6

Siemens, General Electric, by blocking the EU energy-saving lamp China

This is the EU’s export business difficult turn for the better or more thorough end? Jia Qiang anxiously waiting the results.
“sunset review of the preliminary results to come out in October.” September 3, Xiamen Electronics Co., Ltd. Managing Director Donglin Jia Qiang told reporters July 20 from the start, with the EU on China’s energy-saving lamps industry five-year anti-dumping investigation, the EU Trade Commission launched on China’s energy-saving lamp industry’s “sunset review.”
the so-called “sunset review” is in charge of anti-dumping duties Products after the expiration of 5 years to carry out administrative review, “sunset review” will determine the entry into force of anti-dumping is to continue or terminate. Jia Qiang
the same as waiting for the results of energy-saving lamps have many domestic manufacturers, “has dozens of vendors have submitted a review of the questionnaire,” CCCME legal department told reporters stakeholders.
for the outcome of the review, Jia Qiang not very optimistic, because, “Siemens subsidiary Osram’s attitude is still quite tough.” but I hope that also exist, “As Philips continues to clearly expressed their opposition to the extension of China’s energy-saving lamps anti-dumping investigations, the EU internal division may be the opportunity to host the Chinese manufacturers. “Jia Qiang said.
Siemens group of General Electric lamps力阻China
“The biggest obstacle now is the attitude of OSRAM.” Jia Qiang told reporters that it was his understanding that in this sunset review, the Siemens Group has clearly indicated that Chinese manufacturers continue to conduct anti-dumping proceedings.
OSRAM is an important member of the Siemens Group, is the world’s three major manufacturers of electric light source. Journalist to master the internal data show that three of the world’s top energy-saving lamp enterprises GE also add to the ranks of Siemens and Osram, together with the organization of a lobby group “2CFLI”. In July this year, the lobby group held a meeting in London, coordinated action, and then common to the European Commission requested the extension of China’s energy-saving lamp industry, anti-dumping investigations.
“sunset review will normally last a year after publication of the notice within 15-21 days the respondent enterprises to a market economy status completed questionnaire within 40 days the margin of dumping fill out the questionnaire, and then the European Commission of these questionnaires collected to organize the verification, followed by the preliminary ruling, and finally the final. “Longan Law Firm Shenzhen Branch Director贾红卫lawyers said.
“sunset review of China’s energy-saving lamp enterprises may be an opportunity to revive, but not in the hands of the initiative in the hands of Chinese manufacturers.” September 1, China Association of Lighting Electric陈燕生told reporters.
“China’s energy-saving lamp production capacity accounted for 80 percent global share.”陈燕生revealed that in 2005 the export volume of China’s energy-saving lamps is about eight billion U.S. dollars, but exports to the EU, only 130 million U.S. dollars. The huge EU market is basically still in the hands of OSRAM, Philips and other companies hands.
And now, in China CCCME organization already has dozens of energy-saving lamp enterprises in China have decided to participate in the sunset review.陈燕生where China Association of Lighting Electric Association is also involved with the work of vendors to communicate.
in Jia Qiang, China manufacturers Osram blocked the current attitude of powerlessness, “he said we have no way to do so.” Let Jia Qiang more angry is that the “OSRAM side in Europe to block Chinese firms while in the Chinese market without any hindrance of the large-scale expansion of this competition is unfair. “
” This is 5 years our company’s exports to the EU dropped by 90 percent. “Jia Qiang said, but blocked the Chinese manufacturers At the same time, Osram in China is powerful, it even joint acquisition of a company in Hong Kong China’s second largest lamp manufacturers in Foshan Lighting 13.47% stake. Philips
to lobby the EU anti-dumping revocation
“The sunset review is a powerful factor in the European Union began to emerge a different opinion,”陈燕生told reporters, “Philips lobbying for more favorable to Chinese manufacturers.”
In fact, as the world’s largest manufacturers of energy-saving lamps, Philips has become the anti-dumping proceedings “victim”, because of their lighting has been basically the transfer of production bases to China - In Europe, Philips is only in Poland retained the services of an energy-saving lamp factory, mainly produces high-end energy-saving lamps. Yaming except Philips Lighting Co., Ltd. Shanghai, the Philips in China energy-saving lamp exports to the EU market when the same anti-dumping duties be imposed. Energy-saving lamps in the European market, Philips is currently the market share of around 35 percent in sales of many products must be imported from China.
“from Europe to the anti-dumping corporate speaking, is to protect its own interests, but the consumer is concerned, you should let the consumer has the right to enjoy those who are most affordable, most efficient products, this is an irresistible the trend. “艾马希general manager of Philips Lighting reporter in an exclusive interview that if the abolition of China’s energy-saving lamp industry levy anti-dumping duties, China cheap good quality energy-saving lamp products to European consumers will be more use of energy-saving lamps, energy-saving lamps in order to bring the whole industry. Philips
statement to the European Commission to provide the data shows that in the past five years, the Chinese energy-saving lamp industry in anti-dumping investigations, the EU internal energy-saving lamps prices rose 25 percent, “limiting the price increases people’s purchasing power , reducing the environmental protection market. “Philips stressed.
艾马希, revealed to reporters the EU before any major policy, we must listen to the views of industry, especially the views of some large companies, Philips will use this opportunity to lobby the European Union.
In response, EU Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson has said in public that if the implementation of anti-dumping resulted in the deterioration of the environment, they should avoid the extension of China’s energy-saving lamps anti-dumping duties. (06-9-6)