昨天，12个常设委员会第四十届会议审议的城市“北京食品安全条例（修订草案）”，将今天xx。修订改变的7个方面。

变化之一：生产和规范经营非xx多达10万

修订禁止在饮食场所服务，内部食堂食品加工单位销售和储存，使用亚硝酸盐食盐市场，在牲畜和家禽的销售农贸市场以外的行为，高达10万元以下罚款。

记者注意到，原草案的水，如猪，以及5种非法企业强制召回令，xx政府已订出了50万个，{zg}罚款限额作出，并在修订草案前者面临{zg}罚款10万元，这将面临30万罚款。

变化二：食品召回制度应采取主动召回的粮食问题

食品生产企业知道，他们的粮食生产有现实或潜在危害的，应当通知卖方停止销售，告知消费者停止使用，主动召回食品，对有关监管机构报告。

三个转变，即：基层工作的街道，制止食品安全法

修订草案，给街道，制止食品安全违法行为的权力办公室。乡人民政府办公室和非法食品生产，加工，储存和销售等行为的街道，都有权制止，并应协调和监督食品安全监管部门调查和派遣协议，或市，区，县食品安全监管报告。变化

四：6类地方标准可以由地方标准的制定

，明确提出了食物，如病原微生物，农药残留，兽药残留，污染物和其他材料危害人体健康的修订草案规定，规章和其他有限的内容可以是6类发展当地的标准。

在五个变化：群众举报对食品安全的报告明确地

在审议过程中，市民的成员应轻松报告。因此，建议修改食品安全监管当局应在这一领域市民举报电话或电子邮件，属于部门报告的问题，应予以受理，答复。六，改变

：检测的测试样品的成本，政府应该“支付”

食品安全部门的修订明确，卫生，食品质量抽样和其他部门检查，以检测这种买单取样，成本。同时，委员会建议增加法治，应是随机交易结果告知。 7变化

：政府官员，负责食品安全的法律责任，谭

修订草案，以加强政府的监管机构及其工作人员的责任。在他们的食品安全监督管理的职责范围各级城市人民政府。监督的借口争吵缺乏等问题，修订草案增加记大过，降职，纪律，撤职，罚款等删除，主要是为政府部门和直接责任人员追究责任。

“Beijing Food Safety Bill” Today’s vote on the issue of food should take the initiative to recall

Yesterday, the city of twelve fortieth session of the Standing Committee meeting to consider the “Beijing Food Safety Ordinance (Revised Draft)” and will vote today. Revised in the seven aspects of the changes.

change in one: the production and operation of norms OTC up to 100,000

Revised prohibited Services in catering establishments, the market within the food processing unit canteen sales and storage, the use of nitrite salt; in the sale of livestock and poultry farmers market outside of the act, a fine of up to 100,000 yuan.

reporter noted that the original draft to the water, such as Pig, as well as five kinds of illegal enterprises mandatory recall order to resist the Government has made out a maximum fine of 500,000 high-limit, and in the revised draft of the former face a maximum 100,000 fine, which will face a fine of 300,000.

change II: the food recall system should take the initiative to recall the issue of food

food production enterprises know that their production of food there is the reality or potential hazards, it should be to inform the sellers stop selling, inform the consumer to stop the use of the initiative to recall the food, the report to the relevant regulatory authorities.

three changes: the grass-roots level duties streets to stop the food safety law

The revised draft, giving the streets to stop the Office of the power of food safety violations. Township people’s government offices and streets of illegal food production, processing, storage and sale of such acts, have the right to stop, and should coordinate and supervise food safety regulatory agencies investigate and deal with dispatch, or to the city and district and county food safety regulatory report. changes

Four: Class 6 places the standard can be the development of local standards

clearly set out the revised draft of the food such as pathogenic micro-organisms, pesticide residues, veterinary drug residues, contaminants and other material harm to human health, regulations, and other limited categories of content can be 6 to develop local standards.

changes in five: the masses to report a clear way to food safety report

In its deliberations, the members of the public should be reported with ease. Therefore, the revised proposed food safety regulatory authorities should be made public in this sector reported the telephone or e-mail, belonging to the departments to report the matter, should be admissible, the reply. VI change

: Detect the cost of testing samples of the Government should “pay”

for food safety departments the cost of sampling, Revised clearly, health, quality inspection of food sampling and other departments to Detect This foot the bill. At the same time, the Commission proposed to increase the rule of law, shall be informed of the findings by random traders. seven changes

: legal responsibility of government officials responsible for food safety Tam

revised the draft to strengthen the Government’s regulatory agencies and their staff’s responsibility. The city people’s governments at all levels of their own area of food safety supervision and management responsibility. The lack of supervision on the pretext wrangling and other issues, the draft revised added记大过, demoted, disciplined, removed from posts, penalty, etc., is mainly responsible for government departments and persons directly responsible be punished. (07-11-30)