被视为美国的“双反”制裁{dy}铜版纸诉讼案件的诉讼在美国上周突然的转变和戏剧性结束。美国国际贸易委员会的{zh1}决定，使在中国的涂布纸商务部反商业部，美国倾销和反补贴制裁要求化为乌有，强调中美关系的复杂性，中美贸易。涂布纸

触发因为共同关心的现实，外部世界被看作是中美之间在交火中美贸易摩擦最激烈的冲突地区，其中主要原因之一是，美国对中国的涂层纸张适用反补贴制裁的{dy}个商品。
在外地
反倾销，在3月美国今年，商务部作出的初步裁定，在10月作出最终，双方确定的我国企业，中国东纸倾销存在遭到21.12百分之反倾销税，晨鸣纸业也受99.65百分之反倾销税。在反恐领域补贴，3月29日，美国国际贸易法院的裁决，美国可以对中国实施反补贴制造商的制裁。接下来的{yt}，美国商务部“及时”作出初裁，反应用反补贴法中国。 10个月，商务部作出最终，金东纸遭到7.4％的反补贴税，晨鸣一直受到反补贴关税的百分之44.25。

和12月美国国际贸易委员会去年还认定，初步裁决，中国铜版纸使美国企业面临“重大损失或重大损失的风险。”因此，中国的产品是“双反”制裁，只有在该委员会的最终决定一步。

了美国的铜版纸磨刀门刀刮的问题，引起外界的广泛xx，特别是征收反补贴税，但被认为是美国与中国贸易的重大政策改变，因为23年前，美国官员一直“无法对非市场经济国家的反补贴法实施制裁。”美国商务部长古铁雷斯解释说，中国的经济正在失去它的时间已经到中国来补税使用反贴这种贸易调整手段的时机已经成熟。

两个产品的反倾销，反补贴，也是执行，在国际贸易中的障碍已被称为“双重税。”美国一位资深媒体记者在接受采访时说，这是一个非常不公平的做法。

的铜版纸的情况下，美国在反倾销方面，将中国作为非市场经济国家，不考虑中国的实际生产成本，取得了有利于美国企业的决定，在反补贴方面，而且实际上对中国的市场经济，以中国为新的制裁。

此外，美国以打开中国的“双反”措施将是无休止的大门之一。铜版纸之后，美国解决圆管，矩形管，复合袋，备用轮胎，橡胶磁生和6个来自中国轻型热敏纸种启动了“双反”调查。

中国还采取了一系列应对措施。今年4月，商务部文化部颁发的使用多种材料，以便将xx进口的纸制品，增值税退税恢复纸浆出口。 9月，中国政府对美国“双反”制裁更多地诉诸世界贸易组织，2001年是自中国加入世贸组织，中国的首次起诉在美国的组织。

中美就铜版纸案紧张，11月20日，美国国际贸易委员会最终裁定，对中国涂布纸制品业，是不是美国构成损害威胁，美国商务部后， “双反- ”制裁已经注销。中美首次反补贴案件中的胜利。

但是，外面的世界，美国贸易委员会的{zh1}转向，实际上规避了是否对中国的反应用反补贴法。美国商务部门的官员们公开表示，对美国的决定只是一种“暂时的挫折”，商务部将继续对中国的其他调查及商品征收惩罚性关税。中国和美国在“双反”的问题毫无疑问将继续斗争。

事实上，美国“双反”制裁往往更多的政治动机。美国印刷工业协会和美国印刷技术基金会首席执行官迈克尔梅金公开表示，该协会一直支持自由和公平贸易，铜版纸案，“动态”不仅来自美国造纸工业，而且在很大程度上与美国在国际贸易政策。据有关人士透露，该公司带来了新的一页，在这个诉讼，美国印刷协会的强烈反对，并积极游说美国政府不要对中国产品的“双反”制裁。他们认为，如果制裁成为现实，将导致美国国内铜版纸价格，损害了协会成员的整体利益。

Paper highlights the complexity of Sino-US trade

Be treated as U.S. “double reverse” sanctions first coated paper case litigation lawsuit last week in the U.S. suddenly shift and dramatic The End. United States International Trade Commission’s final determination, so that the United States on China’s coated paper business Ministry of Commerce anti-dumping and countervailing sanctions requests come to naught, to highlight the complexity of Sino-US trade. coated paper

trigger litigation because of common concern to the outside world and was regarded as a Sino-US trade friction in the exchange of fire was most intense conflict zones, in which one of the major reasons is that the United States on China’s coated paper are applicable to countervailing sanctions The first merchandise.

in the field of anti-dumping, the United States in March this year, Ministry of Commerce made the preliminary ruling, made final in October, both to determine the existence of dumping of Chinese enterprises, China Dong-paper were subjected to 21.12 percent anti-dumping duties, Chenming Paper was also subject to the 99.65 percent anti-dumping duties. In the field of anti-subsidy, March 29, the United States Court of International Trade ruled that the U.S. can implement countervailing sanctions against Chinese manufacturers. The next day, the U.S. Department of Commerce “timely” to make the preliminary ruling, the application of anti-subsidy law to China. 10 months, Ministry of Commerce made final, Kim Dong-paper were subjected to 7.4% of the countervailing duty, Chenming has been subject to countervailing duties of 44.25 percent.

and the United States International Trade Commission in December last year also finds that the preliminary ruling, the Chinese coated paper so that American businesses face “significant losses or significant risk of loss.” Thus, Chinese products were “double reverse” sanctions, only a step in the final decision of the Commission.

the issue of the United States in the coated paper Modaomen scrape of a knife, causing widespread concern in the outside world, especially the imposition of countervailing duties, but was considered the United States trade with China are major policy changes, because 23 years ago that the United States officials have been “unable to of non-market economies in anti-subsidy law to implement the sanctions. ” U.S. Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez explained that China’s economy is losing its time has now come to China to pay an overdue tax the use of anti-paste such trade adjustment means the time has come.

both products of the anti-dumping, countervailing and also the implementation, which in international trade barriers have been referred to as the “double tax.” The United States, a senior media reporter in an interview said that this is a very unfair practice.

to coated paper case, the United States in anti-dumping context, will be China, as a non-market economies, which do not consider China’s actual production costs, have made the decision in favor of corporate America; in countervailing aspects, but also actually to China as a market economy to China as the new sanctions.

Moreover, the United States to open the gate one of China’s “double reverse” measures will be endless. Following the coated paper, the United States to address the circular pipe, rectangular pipe, composite bags, spare tires, raw rubber magnetic and six kinds of lightweight thermal paper from China initiated the “double reverse” survey.

China has also adopted a series of response measures. In April, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce issued an order of several materials used will be fully imported pulp exports of paper products, the restoration of VAT refund. In September, the Chinese Government has more on the American “double reverse” sanction recourse to the World Trade Organization, which is in 2001 since China’s WTO accession, China’s first prosecution of the organization in the United States.

on Sino-US tension on the coated paper case, the November 20, the United States International Trade Commission final determination, the Chinese coated paper products industry is not the United States constitute a threat of damage, the U.S. Department of Commerce after the “double anti - “Sanctions have been written off. First Sino-US anti-subsidy case to the Chinese victory.

However, the outside world that the United States Trade Commission’s final shift, in fact, to circumvent the question of whether the application of China’s anti-subsidy law. U.S. Department of Commerce officials have openly said that the decision of the United States only a “temporary setback”, Ministry of Commerce will continue to other investigation of China and by imposing punitive tariffs on merchandise. China and the United States in the “double reverse” issue no doubt will continue to struggle.

In fact, the U.S. “double reverse” sanctions are often more politically driven. American Printing Industries Association and the American Printing Technology Foundation迈克尔梅CEO Kim publicly stated that the Association has always supported free and fair trade, coated paper case, “dynamic” is not only from the U.S. paper industry, and in a large extent with the United States in international trade policies. According to related sources, the company brought on a new page in this litigation, the United States printing association strongly opposed, and actively lobbying the U.S. government, not against Chinese products a “double reverse” sanctions. They think that if sanctions become a reality, would cause the United States domestic coated paper prices, harm the overall interests of members of the Association. (07-11-27)