“康齿灵，尼斯，龙力奇，田七”是四大巨头的牙膏生产商，因为国内对这个问题的虚假宣传，已经尝到了苦果在一起。最近，天津，河北区人民法院在市法院与消费者打公益诉讼的决定，上述牙膏厂构成欺诈，判令中国华润超级市场供应商负责“后面一个失去了一只，”民事赔偿责任除了为18.1人民币xx全额退款，他们还需要一个一次性的18.1亿元人民币的经济损失。据了解，目前，这些问题已经从城市牙膏属于先锋厂商超过30家的所有的框架下，该权利方面的成绩，显示出对提高消费者保护工作的市法院。经审理，法院

确定了今年的被告余小姐中国华润万家超市原告在中山路，采购，文化和体育灵止血清火牙膏牙齿，齿白玉洁牙膏科尼斯生活在8月，隆力奇草本精华牙膏，田七xxx牙膏各一的影响，支付了18.1万元。购买后，余小姐发现，在牙膏的包装广告“清热去火，血瘀疼痛点燃引起的牙齿疼痛，牙齿溢流浓度，牙齿出血，口腔溃疡有重大影响”，“清热毒性，抗xx，抗过敏的药理作用，如“”散血止痛，xx功效抑制菌等医疗术语和药理作用的宣传“，以及”{zj0}“的消息，没有任何法律依据，是也是国家法律法规禁止。余小姐作为请求的买价，十八点一元，为18.1亿元人民币的经济损失的赔偿退款的基础。

法院认为，在商品销售过程超市将在诚实守信的原则，遵循以提供优质，安全的产品，不得欺骗，误导消费者，否则，应执行的回报和补偿的义务。原告商品宣传一个中国的“药品管理法实施细则”和“广告法”的有关规定，违反的内容。虽然被告销售的相关检查商品，而是商品广告包装忽略不审查的职责，误导消费者，应负责，认为被告的广告商品的制造商和广告部，无关与被告因商品从生产到销售的地区，应执行与依法履行职责，被告将推卸责任的行为处，法院不予支持。

Four brands of toothpaste in Tianjin more than 30 supermarket shelves

“Kang Ling teeth, NICE, Lung nilfisk, pseudo-ginseng” are the four major domestic manufacturers of toothpaste giant, because of false propaganda against the problem had tasted the bitter fruit together. Recently, Tianjin, Hebei District People’s Court in the city with the consumer playing the public interest litigation decision, that the above-mentioned toothpaste factory constitute fraud, decree China Resources Supermarket vendor is responsible for the “back one lost one,” the civil liability, in addition to a full refund of 18.1 yuan loans, they also need a one-time compensation for economic losses of 18.1 yuan. It is understood that, at present, these issues have been toothpaste Vanguard vendors from the city belong to more than 30 stores all under the frame, the success of the rights, showing that the city courts of the consumer protection efforts of the increase. After hearings, the court

identified in August of this year, the plaintiff to the defendant Miss Yu China Resources Vanguard Supermarket Living under the Zhongshan Road, Purchase, Culture and Sport Branch of Hope hemostasis Qinghuo tooth toothpaste, tooth白玉洁NICE toothpaste, Takashi herbal essence nilfisk toothpaste, herbal toothpaste Tianqi effects of various one, paid a total of 18.1 yuan. After the purchase, Miss Yu found out that the toothpaste packaging advertises “Qingre去火, stasis pain of lit-induced tooth pain, dental overflow concentration, dental bleeding, mouth ulcers have a significant effect” “clearing away heat and toxic, anti-inflammatory, anti-allergic pharmacological effects, such as “” casual blood analgesics, anti-inflammatory efficacy of inhibiting菌等”of medical terminology and pharmacological effects of publicity, as well as” the best “message, there is no legal basis, is also a country of laws and regulations are prohibited. Miss Yu as a basis for requesting refund of the purchase price 18.1 yuan, compensation for economic losses of 18.1 yuan.

The court held that the supermarket in merchandise sales process to be followed in the principles of honesty and trustworthiness to provide quality and safe products, shall not be deceptive, misleading consumers, otherwise, shall carry out the return and compensation obligations. Goods by the plaintiff to publicize the contents of a violation of China’s “Drug Management Law Implementation Rules” and “Advertisement Law” the relevant requirements. Although the defendant had sold merchandise related to inspection, but the neglect of the packaging of merchandise advertising do to review the duties, be misleading to consumers, which should be responsible for, consider the defendant’s advertising merchandise Department of manufacturers and advertisers for, nothing to do with the defendant, because of merchandise from production to sales areas shall perform their duties in accordance with the law, the defendant would shirk the responsibility of the Department of conduct, the court not to support it. (07-11-22)