news alerts

a few days ago, the NPC Standing Committee to the nation, “Property Law (Draft)” The purpose is to collect suggestions from the people. The “draft” published in the Canton has also aroused great concern. Recently, more than the legal profession to a journalist to reveal their views on the draft and made numerous recommendations. These people are well versed in civil law legal experts, experienced lawyers, but also the law-loving general public. Journalist note that their proposals, while not very mature, but they reflect the public concern issues.

recommended one “reasonable compensation” provision should be refined

January this year, in the Canton building one the old residents living on the demolition issue of compensation for Mr. Chang, has not been reached with the developer agreement. Mr. Zhang consider his compensation for demolition of buildings too little, far below the market price; developers that in accordance with the relevant regulations, policies, relocation compensation is very reasonable. To this end, the constant disputes between the two parties.

Mr. Zhang’s experience in land acquisition and demolition of the incident is quite representative, according to relevant statistics, in recent years all over the country, the frequent occurrence of land disputes in the demolition, the vast majority is generated because the issue of compensation.

“Property Law (Draft)” stipulates that land acquisition and demolition “should be compensated in accordance with state regulations; not state, should be given reasonable compensation.”

for “compensation in accordance with state regulations,” this point, China, China and France authoritative industry figures yesterday, Professor Jiang Ping Wang friends in question, said: “There is a fuzzy point, that is what is meant by national regulations. local be considered the provisions of state regulations? If the provisions of the local call state regulations, which have a problem, how the national requirement is unreasonable to do? of the provisions in the course of discussion, I personally think there is room for discretion. at least have two: First, be clear what is stipulated by the state. Secondly, if the national requirement is unreasonable, is not it can be brought within a certain range. If the protection of these two can. “

In addition, “As the ‘reasonable’ is used a larger space for the operation, there is no specific provision, often will lead to unreasonable,” the Guangdong Southern福瑞德law firm post-feng Tang said. In his view, should be “reasonable compensation” to “compensation at market prices.” As for how to determine market prices, you can by a professional assessment body. As a result, acquisition of land, the legitimate rights and interests拆迁户will receive greater protection.

recommendations II district advertising revenue owners have

Panyu District, Miss Wang is a small residential property owners, the house near the road, field of vision is pretty good. In August last year, developers in her house where the floors on the external walls of the brush part of the sales ad. Wang believes that the external walls of properties for sale are the owners should be total, developers must go through the owner’s consent and pay the appropriate fee in order to brush ads. Miss Wang developers when looking for representations, the other said that there was no legal provisions which cell walls of all the proceeds to the owners. In the “Property Law (Draft)” was published, Miss Wang read carefully, hoping to find the relevant provisions, but ultimately disappointed.

this, the Guangdong Southern福瑞德law firm Zhang Jian-liang said that the ownership of the external walls of buildings as well as the related revenue is a property right. He suggested that the “Property Law (Draft)” Article 73 be amended to add “property rights where the facades of buildings, rooftop, belong to the owners there were, and its economic benefits to the advertising of all owners of all.” Zhang Jian-liang said that if Miss Wang proceedings, in accordance with existing laws, may also win a lawsuit. However, if the “Property Law” by adding this content, will be better able to quell the dispute.

three housing proposals did not necessarily register the property rights

Liu Abernathy, a generation living in rural areas, 5 years ago, his own homestead in the village Righetto a set of buildings, but because of many reasons, the house has not been办房产证. A few years later, Liu Abernathy has been living in the house did not feel anything wrong. But recently, a neighbor told him that if we do not办房产证, housing may have one day, they are not his, which made things to worry Liu Arbor.

Liu Arbor house is real property, according to “Property Law (Draft)” Article 4 stipulates that “property rights should be public (for real property for ‘public’ is’ register ‘). recorded real estate register are the property rights of people. “In accordance with the above, Miss Abernathy’s housing rush, he is the true masters of housing.

In this regard, Sun Yat-sen University School of Law, Associate Professor Min said that the above provisions clearly a problem. In China’s rural areas, many people own their own houses to live, there is no sale and purchase of housing, although there was no registration, but that should not, therefore, they are not his house. Therefore, the proposed “Property Law (Draft)” Article 4 to read: “Property transactions should be public.”

the proposed four environmental pollution lawsuit举证倒置

In recent years, a chemical plant has been around a few hundred villagers feel that the factory smoke emissions of their physical damage, and more meeting with management representations has been to no avail. Not long ago, the villagers to plant to court. However, in court, the villagers faced with the burden of embarrassment, they will have to submit evidence of the gas chemical hazardous to health. For these cultural level of farmers is not high, it is necessary to make such evidence is no doubt very difficult.

“Property Law (Draft)” Article 94 stipulates that “the rights of real estate are entitled to in accordance with the law to prohibit the rights of adjacent emission of air pollutants, water pollutants, solid waste and used noise, light , magnetic and radiation and other harmful substances. “

Zhang Jian-liang said that he encountered a number of such lawsuits pose a lot of problems of proof the plaintiff. Only the foregoing, the provisions of this article is incomplete, there is no举证倒置principles, the rights of victims very difficult to be protected.

Therefore, Zhang Jian-liang suggested that, in paragraph 94, add the words: “the right to sue people to prove that sound or no effect on the burden of proof from the adjacent rights of the person who, otherwise, presumed to be infringing.”

recommended five registered owners may be time-limited error corrections

in the Canton of state organs of one Mr. Wang Binjiang East three years ago bought a set of house, not long ago, he got the look long-standing real estate certification. Mr. Wang’s house in the 12th floor, but one拿到房产证, immediately on him dumbfounded, and real estate certificate says it was the floor, 28th floor. Registration office to register his house was wrong. Now, Mr. Wang also eager to sell this house, but encountered such a situation, the sale of the house certainly be affected. “How to correct, how long can be corrected?” Mr. Wang has been busy consulting.

“Property Law (Draft)” to the community after the release of Mr. Wang Xue legal origin also take up fine read, but he has not found the relevant requirements. Mr. Wang told reporters that he encountered this are not uncommon. Therefore, Mr. Wang suggested that “the Property Law (Draft)” to add a: “there is evidence that the wrong registration office to register, real estate rights registration office shall have the right to make corrections in a month.”

Recommendation VI to change the residential use subject to approval

At present, more developed as a result of commercial, sub-Canton can be said to be row upon row of shops, in some old town, the majority of such shops converted from residential buildings . Well, residential to restaurant, entertainment and other purposes, whether to go through what kind of people’s approval?

“Property Law (Draft)” states: “will be changed to residential dining, entertainment and other commercial buildings, it should be by the consent of all owners interested.”

for this article, Sun Yat-sen University School of Law, An Min, an associate professor think, residential to commercial uses to “by the consent of all owners interested” is good, his mind is to protect相邻权, but only the consent of all owners is not enough change the residential use must go through the planning department approval.

Therefore, some experts have recommended that the article should read “shall be subject to the consent of all owners interested planning department for approval.”

Professor “pick thorn”

provisions should not be advised to fine-coarse

the whole, “draft” in which aspects we can improve it? Guangdong University of Business Studies Faculty of Law, Associate Professor MA Xin Xue proposed “draft” should be more forward-looking, detailed provisions should be advised to not rough and so on.

Ma new doctrine, this “draft” does not deal with now appears new, it should be said that forward-looking is not enough. For example, virtual property, in recent years there have been many disputes, “Property Law (Draft)” and places mentioned.

“draft” only 268, many of the provisions are too general, interoperability is not strong. It can be expected, “Property Law” In the future, need to be supplemented by a number of judicial interpretations, this would reduce the “Property Law” in height, to weaken its authority. Since it is collecting the views of all the people, then they would have more detailed articles, in order to compress the views of the majority of judges of the minority groups in future discretionary space. Therefore, “property law” should not be advised to fine-coarse, even an increase of provisions. (Planning Journalist窦丰WU Xue-Dong Ke)

物权法草案广您：有多少土地在合理的搬迁补偿

新闻快讯

在几天前，全国人民代表大会常务委员会对全国， “物权法（草案） ”的目的是收集意见的人。该“草案”公布在广东也引起极大关注。最近，超过法律界人士向记者透露他们的意见，并就草案提出了许多建议。这些人熟谙民法的法律专家，经验丰富的律师，而且还依法爱好一般公众。记者注意到，他们的建议，但不很成熟，但它们反映了公众关注的问题。

推荐一个“合理补偿”的规定应改进

今年1月，在广东建设一个老居民的拆迁补偿问题的张先生，还没有与开发商达成的协议。张先生认为，他的赔偿拆除建筑物太少，远远低于市场价格;开发，按照有关法规，政策，搬迁赔偿是非常合理的。为此，不断争端双方之间的。

张先生的经验，土地征用和拆迁的事件是相当的代表性，据有关统计，近几年全国各地，经常发生土地纠纷的拆迁中，绝大多数是因为产生赔偿问题。

“物权法（草案） ”规定，土地征用和拆迁“应赔偿按照国家有关规定;没有国家，应给予合理的补偿。 ”

的“补偿按照国家有关规定， ”这一点上，中国，中国和法国xx的业内人士昨天，姜教授王平朋友的问题，说： “有一个模糊点，就是指的是什么国家法规。当地被认为是国家法规规定的？如果规定的地方国家有关规定要求，其中有一个问题，如何在国家的要求是不合理的怎么办呢？规定在讨论的过程中，我个人认为有酌情处理的空间。至少有两个：首先，必须明确什么是国家规定。第二，如果国家的要求是不合理的，是不是可以把在一定范围内。如果保护这两个可以“ 。

此外， “由于’合理’用一个更大的运作空间，但没有具体规定，往往会导致不合理的， ”广东南方福瑞德律师事务所后唐锋说。他认为，应该是“合理补偿”改为“按市场价格补偿。 ”至于如何确定市场价格，可以由专业评估机构。其结果是，购置土地的合法权利和利益拆迁户将得到更大的保护。

建议二区广告收入业主

番禺区王小姐是一个小型的住宅物业的业主，房子附近的道路，视野很不错。去年8月，开发商在她家的楼外墙刷部分销售广告。王认为，外墙的待售地产为业主应总，开发商必须经过业主同意，并支付适当费用，以刷广告。王小姐找开发商交涉时，对方说，没有法律规定细胞壁的所有收益的业主。在“物权法（草案） ”发表后，王小姐仔细阅读，希望能找到的有关规定，但最终失望了。

对此，广东南方福瑞德律师事务所张建良说，拥有楼宇外墙，以及相关的收入是一种财产权利。他建议， “物权法（草案） ”第73条进行修订，以增加“知识产权在建筑物外墙，天台，属于业主共有，其经济利益的广告的所有业主所有。 ”张建良说，如果王小姐程序，按照现行法律，也可能胜诉。但是，如果“物权法”中加入这一内容，将能更好地平息争端。

建议不一定登记的财产权利

刘阿伯纳希，一代人生活在农村地区， 5年前，他自己的家园村托了一套楼房，但由于多种原因，房子还没有办房产证。几年后，刘阿伯纳希一直住在家里不觉得有何不妥。但是最近，一位邻居告诉他，如果我们不办房产证，房屋可能有{yt}就不是他的，这使得事情担心刘植树节。

刘安娜堡房子是不动产，根据“物权法（草案） ”第4条规定， “财产权利应该是公开的（不动产为’公共’是’登记’ ） 。记录房地产登记的财产权利人。 “根据上述规定，小姐阿伯纳希住房匆忙，他是真正的主人的住房。

在这方面，中山大学法学院副教授敏说，上述规定显然是一个问题。在中国的农村地区，许多人拥有自己的房子住，没有任何销售和购买住房，虽然没有登记，但不应因此，他们不是他的房子。因此，拟议中的“物权法（草案） ”第4条改为： “物业交易应该是公开的。 ”

拟议四个环境污染诉讼举证倒置

近年来，化工厂已经有几百名村民认为工厂排放的黑烟其身心损害，而且与管理交涉一直是无济于事。不久前，村民种植法庭。然而，在法庭上，村民们面临着尴尬的负担，他们将要提交的证据天然气化学危害健康。对于这些农民文化水平不高，有必要作出这样的证据，无疑是非常困难的。

“物权法（草案） ”第94条规定， “不动产权利都有权依照法律规定，禁止相邻权利排放的空气污染物，水污染物，固体废物处理和利用噪音，光线，磁性和辐射和其他有害物质。 “

张建良说，他遇到了一些这样的诉讼带来了很多问题，举证责任在原告。只有上述情况，本条的规定是不完整的，没有举证倒置原则，受害人的权利很难得到保护。

因此，张健良建议，在第94段，加上： “起诉权人，证明无害或无影响的举证责任由相邻的权利，谁的人，否则，推定为侵权。 “

建议五个注册业主可限时错误更正

在广东的一个国家机关的王先生滨江东三年前买了一套房子，没多久前，他得到了从长期的房地产证书。王先生的房子在12楼，但有拿到房产证，立即对他目瞪口呆，房地产证书说，这是楼， 28楼。登记办公室登记他的家是错误的。现在，王先生也急于出售这所房子，但遇到这种情况下，出售的房子肯定会受到影响。 “如何正确的，多长时间可以改正？ ”王先生一直忙于咨询。

“物权法（草案） ”向社会公布后，汪须厄先生合法来源也采取了罚款读，但他一直没有找到相关的规定。王先生告诉记者，他遇到这种情况并非不常见。因此，王先生认为， “物权法（草案） ”补充： “有证据显示，错误的登记处登记，房地产权登记机关应有权作出更正在一个月内。 ”

建议六改变住宅用途批准

目前，较为发达，由于商业，亚广可以说是鳞次栉比的商店，在一些老城区，大多数这类商店转为住宅楼宇。那么，住宅，以餐饮，娱乐和其他用途，是否经过什么样的人的批准？

“物权法（草案） ”指出： “将改为住宅餐饮，娱乐和其他商业大厦，应该由所有业主同意的情况感兴趣。 ”

本条，中山大学法学院，安民，副教授认为，住宅商业用途“的所有业主同意兴趣”是好的，他心里是为了保护相邻权，但只有所有业主的同意是不够的改变住宅用途必须经过规划部门批准。

因此，一些专家建议说，该条应改为“应受所有业主同意感兴趣规划部批准。 ”

教授的“ Pick眼中钉”

规定不应宜细粗

整体而言， “草案”在这方面我们可以改善？广东商学院法律系副教授马新学建议“草案”应该更具有前瞻性，详细规定应建议不粗糙等等。

马新的理论，这个“草案”不涉及现在出现新的，应该说，前瞻性是不够的。例如，虚拟财产，在最近几年出现了许多纠纷， “物权法（草案） ” ，并提到的地方。

“草案”仅268 ，许多规定过于笼统，操作性不强。可以预料， “物权法”在未来，需要补充一些司法解释，这会减少“物权法”的高度，以削弱其xx。因为这是收集的意见，所有的人，然后他们会更详细的文章，以压缩的意见，多数法官的少数群体在未来的自由裁量空间。因此， “物权法”不应该向细粗，甚至增加了规定。 （策划窦丰记者吴学董克）