Grigori Perelman: Millennium Prize of Clay Mathematics Institute 涓庡ぉ鎵嶇殑蹇冪伒

      Grigoriy Perelman 鎷掔粷浜?Clay Mathematics Institute 鐨?Millennium Prize锛?/span>100涓囩編鍦嗭級銆?/span>

    涓€鑸涓?/span>Grigoriy Perelman鍦?/span>2004骞磋瘉鏄庝簡Poincare conjecture銆傚叧浜?/span>Grigoriy Perelman鐨勮瘉鏄庯紝鍙鏋佸叾灏戦噺鐨勪簤璁€?/span>

        Perelman杩樻嫆缁濅簡2006骞村害鑿插皵鍏瑰Fields Medal銆備粬鏄涓€涓嫆缁?/span>Fields Medal鐨勬暟瀛﹀銆?/span> 

杩樿寰?strong> Vincent van Gogh 鍚楋細

Artists must search for truth with integrity.

鑹烘湳鐨勪环鍊间笌閲戦挶姣笉鐩稿共.

鐪熷偦鏈€澶х殑鎮插搥锛氳皝鏉ユ嫰鏁戞垜杩欎釜璐┆鐨勫唴蹇冿紵

In August 2006, PERELMAN was awarded the Fields Medal, which is widely considered to be the top honor a mathematician can receive. However, he declined to accept the award or appear at the congress.

GRIGORI PERELMAN, WHO was awarded the Fields Medal in Mathematics.

GRIGORI PERELMAN giving the Simons lectures at MIT, 11 April 2003 Photograph by Tom Mrowka

 ————————— 鐩稿叧璧勬枡 —————————

Manifold Destiny

A legendary problem and the battle over who solved it.

by Sylvia Nasar and David Gruber August 28, 2006

Mathematics, more than many other fields, depends on collaboration. Most problems require the insights of several mathematicians in order to be solved, and the profession has evolved a standard for crediting individual contributions that is as stringent as the rules governing math itself. As Perelman put it, “If everyone is honest, it is natural to share ideas.” Many mathematicians view ***’s conduct over the Poincaré as a violation of this basic ethic, and worry about the damage it has caused the profession. “Politics, power, and control have no legitimate role in our community, and they threaten the integrity of our field,” Phillip Griffiths said.

Perelman repeatedly said that he had retired from the mathematics community and no longer considered himself a professional mathematician. He mentioned a dispute that he had had years earlier with a collaborator over how to credit the author of a particular proof, and said that he was dismayed by the discipline’s lax ethics. “It is not people who break ethical standards who are regarded as aliens,” he said. “It is people like me who are isolated.”

Mikhail Gromov, the Russian geometer, said that he understood Perelman’s logic: “To do great work, you have to have a pure mind. You can think only about the mathematics. Everything else is human weakness. Accepting prizes is showing weakness.” Others might view Perelman’s refusal to accept a Fields as arrogant, Gromov said, but his principles are admirable. “The ideal scientist does science and cares about nothing else,” he said. “He wants to live this ideal. Now, I don’t think he really lives on this ideal plane. But he wants to.”

鏉ヨ嚜缃戜笂鐨勪竴浜涚炕璇戯紙闈炵泩鍒╃敤閫旓紝璋㈣阿锛侊級锛?/span>

浣╅浄灏旀浖鍙嶅璇翠粬宸茬粡閫€鍑轰簡鏁板鐣岋紝涓嶅啀璁や负鑷繁鏄亴涓氭暟瀛﹀浜嗐€備粬鎻愬埌澶氬勾鍓嶄粬鍚屼竴浣嶅悎浣滆€呭氨濡備綍璇勪环鏌愪釜浣滆€呯殑涓€椤瑰伐浣滄墍鍙戠敓鐨勪簤鎵с€備粬璇翠粬瀵逛簬瀛︾晫鏉炬噲鐨勯亾寰疯鑼冩劅鍒伴潪甯告伯涓с€?ldquo;涓嶆槸閭ｄ簺杩濊儗閬撳痉鏍囧噯鐨勪汉琚湅浣滃紓绫伙紝”浠栬锛?ldquo;鑰屾槸璞℃垜杩欐牱鐨勪汉琚绔嬭捣鏉ャ€?/font>”