<p>原文：<br />
A short time after I posted the original article, the filter itself was edited and "gay" was removed. This coincided with a thread being created on the discussion forum by user "rpmmatt" referencing the GayGamer.net article. I have no way of knowing what was the reason the filter was changed, as I have still not received any replies from Valve corporate <a href="http://www.cshst.com/en/gate_valves.html">Resilient Seated Gate Valves</a>
or the volunteer moderators I have contacted at any point.
Unfortunately this appears to be a Pyrrhic victory. While the filter was changed, it doesn't look like anyone on the forum staff will be backing that change up with an appropriate response towards policing the forums to improve the atmosphere. When the aforementioned discussion roamed the world of off-topic everywhere from "gay people are abnormal" to "gay people are selfishly hurting humanity because they won't pass their genes down via reproduction" it's <a href="http://www.cshst.com/en/automatic_control_valve.html">Automatic Control Valves</a>
obvious that there is need of a culture shift that won't happen whether three letters are turned into pink hearts or not. It's disappointing that LGBT discussions aren't allowed because of their potential to be volatile conversations, and it's disappointing that the preferred response by the moderating staff is to lock and delete these threads instead
In the end, as I said in the previous entry, Valve and Valve's forum moderators are absolutely allowed to moderate their forums however they choose. As a private <a href="http://www.cshst.com/en/butterfly_valves.html">Butterfly Valves</a>
company they don't need to justify or explain anything to anyone. However, as a long time customer and huge advocate of Steam, I find this whole experience very disheartening and ultimately saddening.
<br />
原文来自：  http://gaygamer.net/2009/12/update_on_valve_censorship.html</p>
<p>Update On Valve Censorship;是由<a href="http://www.cshst.com  "> 上海赛泰泵阀有限公司</a>提供的阀门新闻，中文译文仅供参考(上海赛泰泵阀有限公司还生产
<a href="http://www.cshst.com/jiezhifa.html">截止阀</a>
<a href="http://www.cshst.com/diefa.html">蝶阀</a>
<a href="http://www.cshst.com/zhihuifa.html">止回阀</a>
<a href="http://www.cshst.com/anquanfa.html">安全阀</a>
<a href="http://www.cshst.com/huxifa.html">呼吸阀</a>
 及高压焊接球阀，一片式球阀，法兰球阀，对夹连接V形球阀，美标波管截止阀，欢迎您的选购。) <br />
以下是参考译文：</p>
<p>译文：阀门论坛<br />
该线程持续了一段时间，但它与夹杂一些愚蠢的答复，主要是它明显优于我不会对一个大的阀门一个多元的游戏论坛预期。然而，被关闭等类似问题的解决，使许多其他问题。要{zh0}的，我能确定，筛选实施限制其他海报的行为呼吁彼此是否定的，和以前的主题已被模糊，因为论坛的封闭政策，指出不能讨论有关问题创造出的可能会有争议。
可惜这似乎是一种得不偿失的胜利。当过滤器被更改，但并不像在论坛上的工作人员任何人都支持其对警务工作座谈会，改善气氛恰当的回应，变革的步伐。当漫步在上述讨论的“同性恋是不正常的人”到“同性恋人民的小康世界各地的主题伤害人类的自私，因为他们不会降低他们的基因通过复制”很显然，有一种文化的转变的需要的不会发生有三个字母或成粉红色的心没有打开。这是令人失望的是同性恋的讨论，并不是因为允许其潜力动荡的谈话，这是令人失望的是温和的工作人员所希望的是锁定和删除，而这些线程的巡逻和控制的偏执狂和巨魔。关闭这些线程只奖励那些消极的成功是愚蠢的行为，虽然我向谁处理的工作人员在自愿基础上的论坛，我的同情任何人，我不认为“这太辛苦了”实在是正确的做法。
{zh1}，正如我在以前的入境，阀门和阀门的论坛的{jd1}可以温和的论坛，但是他们选择。作为一家私人公司，他们不需要任何理由或向任何人解释。然而，由于长期以来客户和蒸汽的巨大主张，我觉得这非常令人沮丧的整个过程，并最终痛心。
</p>
<p>更多新闻<br />
<li> <a href="http://www.zhafa.org/news_detail_140.html" title="阀门合同在巴西近海签约   ">阀门合同在巴西近海签约   </a></li>

<li> <a href="http://www.zhafa.org/news_detail_139.html" title="学报报告阀门泄漏问题  ">学报报告阀门泄漏问题  </a></li>

<li> <a href="http://www.zhafa.org/news_detail_138.html" title="中美安全阀门">中美安全阀门</a></li>

<li> <a href="http://www.zhafa.org/news_detail_137.html" title="核电厂阀门关闭">核电厂阀门关闭</a></li>
</p>