出生地:產房 國籍:地球 性別:不中不西 身高:足夠跟女人接吻的高度 最喜歡的顏色:情色 甚麼時間結婚:當街上的女人不再望我的時候 最喜歡的人:自己(不是自戀) 最認識的事物:自己的事 最不滿意自己的地方:錢包 最難忘的時刻:收到稅單 最喜歡做的事情:看存款 最喜歡去的地方:銀行 最喜歡的說話:批評接受,規矩照舊 最喜歡國家:叔貪娼廉的國家 最喜歡過的生活:BB生活,吃喝玩睡,大哭大笑 Touch Wood!!! 大吉利事 如有雷同,實屬天意。
| ||
化妆品的丑陋面(化妆品与动物实验)
大部份的人都不知道他们的「樱桃红」唇膏是用动物的痛苦换来的。 化妆品因为人体长期使用与接触,必须确保不会有刺激、毒性以及变异的反应,所以,制造厂通常是动物实验来证实安全无虞,然后才 进入人体临床实验。现今的动 物实验是极为残酷而不得要 领的,为了化妆品及其它非生存必需品所做的动物实验是极不道德的。而且,动物实验的结果,从来就没有阻止任何产品问世。 不必要的残酷实验 「Draize眼睛刺激性测试」,是用来衡 量某种产品可能对人类眼睛的刺激程度。兔子,总是被拿来做这种测试的动物,因为他们没有泪水,所以不会因为泪水 把测试物质从他们的眼中冲洗掉。这些兔子们一只只被锁住并绑起来, 他们的下眼睑被拉开,滴入测试物质,然后他们的眼睛立刻被人强迫紧闭,好让测试物质的刺 激性达到最强。像这样的测试物质甚至包括洗洁剂、发胶及指甲油。 进行Draize测试的兔子 (照片:PETA) 「Draize测试」发明于1944年,使用至今而无任何改变。科学上许多实验方法只是因为「习
惯」,缺乏动力去发展或使用更人道且科学的方法, 「Draize测试」是诸多此类实验之一。许许多多的兔子因为痛苦挣扎而折断了脖子,而受过测试的兔子所得到的痛苦包括眼睛刺痛、溃烂、出血
而至失明。他 们得不到任何医疗,而在实验结束后,所有的兔子,不论健康与否,
全部都会被杀死。 How does a company get on the list? Companies listed either signed PETA's statement of assurance or provided a statement verifying that they do not conduct or commission any animal tests on ingredients, formulations, or finished products and that they pledge not to do so in the future. How do I know that these companies really don't test on animals? To a degree, the statement of assurance is a matter of trust. However, companies are putting their integrity on the line when they respond to consumers. A company that has publicly announced an end to its animal tests and states in writing that it doesn't test on animals would face a public relations disaster (and potential lawsuits) if it were caught testing on animals. Companies are well aware that consumers are serious about the issue of animal testing, and they know that it would ruin the public's confidence in their products if consumers discovered that companies were being dishonest about their animal-testing policies. What about a product whose label says, 'No Animal Testing,' but whose manufacturing company is not on PETA's 'Don't Test' list? Labels can be deceiving, so be careful. No specific laws exist regarding cruelty-free labeling of products, so companies can take liberties. While it is unlikely that a company would put blatantly false information about its animal-testing practices on its products, the statements that it does make might not be fully informative and might indeed mislead consumers. For example, the label on Clairol's Herbal Essence shampoo states that it is not tested on animals; Clairol, however, does test other products on animals. Many animal-testing companies have some cruelty-free products, but we must boycott all the companies' products in order to pressure them into stopping all animal tests. If the label on a company's product says that it is not tested on animals and the company isn't on either of PETA's lists, please share the company's contact information with PETA so that we can formally inquire about the company's animal-testing policy. Likewise, if you communicate with a company that claims to be cruelty-free but is not on our list, please ask for a statement in writing and send a copy of the statement to PETA. We will communicate with the company to see if it meets all our cruelty-free criteria. Meanwhile, PETA recommends purchasing products made only by companies on our "Don't Test" list. Why do some companies' product labels say, 'No Animal Ingredients,' when, in fact, they contain beeswax, lanolin, whey, etc.? Some companies are not educated about or sensitive to the suffering of animals in the production of certain products that do not involve the actual slaughter of animals. PETA attempts to educate these companies, but some have persisted in inaccurately labeling their products as free of animal ingredients even though it is a fact that honey, lanolin, etc., are animal products. Our advice is always to read the entire label before believing such a statement, and we encourage you to voice your complaints to these companies as well. For our list of "Animal Ingredients and Their Alternatives," please visit CaringConsumer.com. How often are PETA's product lists updated? PETA's "Do Test" and "Don't Test" factsheets are updated approximately every month to reflect additions (e.g., if we are informed of a new company's policy prohibiting animal testing), deletions (e.g., if a company that doesn't test on animals is purchased by an animal-testing company or if a company goes out of business), changes in contact information, etc. These factsheets are based on the most current information available at the time of printing. Companies might have changed their animal-testing policies after this was printed. PETA reserves the right to choose which companies will be included, based on companies' policies. Inclusion on any list is not an endorsement by PETA of a company or any of its products. Please contact PETA if you have any questions about the status of listed companies or if you know the address of a company that is not listed. The following companies manufacture products that ARE NOT tested on animals. Those marked with an asterisk (*) manufacture strictly vegan products—made without animal ingredients, such as milk and egg byproducts, slaughterhouse byproducts, lanolin from sheep, honey, or beeswax (for a list of animal ingredients and their alternatives, please contact PETA or visit CaringConsumer.com). Companies without an asterisk might offer some vegan products. Some of the company names are followed by the name of their parent or subsidiary companies or by examples of products manufactured by that company. Legend * The company makes or sells strictly vegan products. ? The company's products can be purchased through the online PETA Mall at PETAMall.com, and PETA will receive 5 to 10 percent of every purchase at no additional cost to you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What's wrong with pet food? Caring consumers might never guess that thousands of dogs, cats and other sensitive animals are confined in laboratories for years on end and subjected to cruel experiments in order to test dog and cat food. To expose this tragedy, PETA conducted a nine-month undercover investigation of a laboratory that performed cruel animal tests for Iams and other major companion-animal food companies. What our investigator uncovered, including the following, would outrage anyone with a heart: ? Lonely dogs driven mad from confinement to barren steel and cement cells ? Dogs dumped on cold concrete flooring after having chunks of muscle cut out of their thighs ? Experimenters who severed dogs' vocal cords in order to keep them quiet ? Sick dogs who were languishing in their cages without veterinary care These animals suffered so that Iams and other companion-animal food companies could slap "new and improved" labels on their products. The following companies make top- quality food for dogs and cats—without harming animals in laboratories. Please help us drive animal abusers out of business by buying only from these companies. Companies not on this list either responded that they do conduct laboratory experiments on animals or they failed to respond to our numerous inquiries and are assumed to conduct laboratory experiments on animals. For more information about how dog and cat food is contaminated with cruelty and to find the most up-to-date list of companies that don't test on animals, check out |
||