2010-06-15 01:06:06 来自: 枫林仙(没有富士康就没有新中国)
能看透装逼者，而自己也不再装逼的人，是值得肯定的。

因为诚实是做人的{dy}要义。

看过豆瓣上对刘瑜从经典到经验的争论，实属无聊。当中好多装逼者啊。

这就是中国的读书人。紧装，装紧。

比如在那张帖子里到处装逼的女人北海月，开口黑格尔，闭口辩证法。实际上，此人从来没有通读过黑格尔的任何一本著作。你在西南民族大学的讲台上，放毒还少吗？

莫装逼，装逼遭雷劈。

----------------------
+1

我喜欢Urbanatommy.com的访谈里Hessler的一段话.

记者问他：
The book you should have read but haven’t?
．．．
With reading, I’m more inclined to feel relief than guilt. I feel fortunate that I never read one word written by Ayn Rand. I’m grateful that I haven’t cracked a book by Nietzsche. While more thoughtful teenagers were reading Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, I was wearing a red vest and working the concessions stand at a movie theatre in mid-Missouri that showed Top Gun four times a day for an entire summer. What an experience! I’m also relieved that I haven’t read any experimental poetry of the modern period. I avoided anything by Susan Sontag. One Paul Auster novel was more than enough. I did On the Road with Kerouac, and that was it. When that annoying over-serious child character in Jude the Obscure finally hung himself, I said “Great!” and never read another Hardy novel. It makes me happy to think of all the books I’ve missed.

哈哈哈！喜欢Hessler这个家伙．对啊！书就是应该这样读（或者不读）的！


（转自豆友Jean (moved like a patch of night)博客文章：Peter Hessler的新书）
个人还是喜欢刘瑜和Hessler的阅读口味，以真是世界的前提出发，探求能够被证伪的理论。

2010-06-15 23:46:03 左思 (从无知走向无知) 　2010-06-15 22:03:37: 深寒 (时隔多年，再次陷入了疯狂)　　 问题其实很简单，现象不能用来解释现象，所以才需要理论。只是对于大多数人来说仅仅了解现象就够了。
　　==================
　　非常同意，这个观点在张五常《经济解释》{dy}卷{dy}章中详细表述
------------------------------


楼上是在赞同隐秘的高等知识么？