上周五,上海消费者保护委员会发布了一份“洗衣粉比较试验结果,说:”宝洁的“汰渍”净白去渍自然香味的无磷洗涤剂去污力,而不是国家标准。宝洁“无辜”,坚持认为,潮“是一个合格的标准产品”,并强调国家标准的洗衣粉标准建议。这是“潮”第二次被指责为不符合标准。
潮“失败”名单
检测据报道,12种洗衣粉样品中,“潮”美白去渍自然香味的无磷洗衣粉去污水力量比国家标准要求的少;去在模拟试验中,13%渍洗衣粉较难去除酱油和石油。
据报道,比较了12个样本测试了在上海的两个大型超市工作人员随机购买,涉及8个制造商,包括一个秘密,汰渍,碧浪,白色,干净的暴君,等等。试验的基础上比较,建议国家标准GB/T13171-2004“洗衣粉”进行。结果表明,广州宝洁公司的“潮去渍美白自然香味的无磷洗衣粉”(净含量:560克,批号:20070123NJ),去污力不符合国家标准,其余11个样本按照标准的要求。
事实上,在2005年6月,中国洗涤用品工业协会公布了{dy}季度的非无磷洗衣粉是测试结果还表明,宝洁公司和汉高公司专业生产“潮净白去渍无磷洗衣粉“和”天晴洗涤剂去污力指标不标准“。
宝洁公司表示,这两个标准之间的差异
上周六,在宝洁公司发出函件,汰渍消费者说:“潮汐部分美白产品包括汰渍洗依照有关法律和法规xx符合去渍衣物粉产品质量要求,标准合格产品。严格的产品不仅有工厂测试,并已取得国家专业检测机构定期检查,以确保上市的产品,以实现可持续和稳定的标准“的xx。
潮品牌经理对外事务高嘉嗣说,由国家xx专业测试机构的浪潮,“国家洗涤用品质量监督检验测试中心”检测,产品符合标准,综合去污力低于标准清洁剂更好的要求。
的测试结果,宝洁
认为,企业标准与国家标准存在。高嘉嗣说,“差别在于,宝洁公司在确定G的企业标准去污力使用了国际标准方法的原则,事实五个污迹日常生活中,消费者经常会遇到选择清洗的实际对比。国家标准是使用了3个模拟器技术的污渍类型的决心。“他认为,由在很大程度上影响评价方法。
两个标准“打架”专家建议强制推行“国标”
据悉,中国的洗涤剂产品是由标准–GB/T13171-2004“洗粉服装研究所”的标准推荐,企业可以实现国家标准,而且还可以运行在自行制定企业标准,企业标准只在当地技术监督检验检疫记录,国家鼓励企业发展,以满足并超过国家标准建议企业标准组织生产。郦拜
发言人许晓东集团认为,企业标准,其市场定位和成本效益的关系并不一定高于或低于国家标准。在业内人士陈先生还表示,“如果在低端市场的主要产品,某些标准可能会比国家标准低要求,”
但是,大多数消费者认为,国家建议对测试结果的基础标准。
广东商会常务副秘书长商会日期秘书长谷俊认为,过去两年洗涤剂工业接二连三发生争议的事件检测标准之一。国家应制定强制性标准的清洁剂“的标准是{zd1}标准,行业,各类型洗衣粉的{zd1}门槛进入市场,今后的监管和检查过程的质量则都公认标准。“
Tide laundry detergent is not being achieved去污力
Last Friday, the Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee issued a “detergent compare test results,” said Procter & Gamble’s “Tide” Whitening去渍natural scent of non-phosphorus detergent去污力, not country standards. Procter & Gamble “innocence”, insisted that the Tide “is a qualified standard products” and stressed that national standards are detergent standards recommend. It is the “Tide” Second accused of not meeting the standard.
Tide to a “failure list”
Detect According to reports, samples of 12 kinds of detergent, the “Tide” Whitening去渍natural scent of non-phosphorus washing powder go sewage force less than the requirements of national standards;去渍in simulated trials, 13% of detergent more difficult to remove the soy sauce and oil.
It is reported that compared the 12 samples tested by staff from the two large supermarkets in Shanghai randomly buy, involving eight manufacturers, including a secret, Tide, Persil, white, clean tyrants, and so on. Test based on comparison of national standards recommend GB/T13171-2004 “washing powder” to carry out. The results showed that Guangzhou P & G’s “Tide去渍Whitening natural scent of non-phosphorus washing powder” (Net Content: 560 grams, batch number: 20070123NJ),去污力do not meet national standards, and the remaining 11 samples were in accordance with standard requirements .
In fact, in June 2005, China Cleaning Products Industry Association announced the first quarter of non-phosphorus washing powder was the test results also showed that Procter & Gamble and Henkel company specializes in the production of “Tide Whitening去渍non-phosphorus washing powder “and” Tianqing detergent “in去污力not standard indicators.
Procter & Gamble, said the difference between the two standards
last Saturday, to Procter & Gamble issued a letter Tide consumer said, “Tide sections Whitening products include Tide washing去渍clothing powder in full compliance with relevant laws and regulations on product quality requirements, standards are qualified products. Strict Products not only have the factory test, and has the authority of the state professional testing body regular inspections to ensure that the listed products to achieve sustainable and stable standards. “< br="">
Tide brand manager for external affairs high嘉嗣said Tide by professional testing agencies of state authority, “National Cleaning Products Quality Supervision and Testing Center” test, the products comply with the requirements of the standard, integrated去污力better than the standard detergent .
for the test results, P & G believes that corporate standards and national standards exist. High嘉嗣said, “the difference lies in the fact that P & G’s corporate standards in the determination去污力used the principles of the international standard method, select consumers often encounter in their daily lives among the five stains to wash the actual contrast. The national standard is used Determination of three types of simulator technology stains. “In his view, the evaluation method in large measure by the impact.
two standards “fighting” experts recommend mandatory push “GB”
It is reported that China’s detergent products are recommended by the standards of the National Institute of Standards –GB/T13171-2004 “wash clothing powder “, enterprises can implement national standards, but also can run on its own, formulate enterprise standards, enterprise standards only at the local technical supervision Inspection and Quarantine record, and the country to encourage enterprises to develop to meet and exceed the national standards recommend the enterprise standard to organize production. Li Bai
spokesman Xu Xiaodong Group believes that enterprise standards with its market positioning and cost-effective relationship has not necessarily higher or lower than the national standards. Those in the trade have Mr. Chen also said that “If the main products in the low-end market, certain standards may be less than the national standards require that”
However, most consumers believe the country recommend standards based on test results .
date of Guangdong Chamber of Commerce Deputy Secretary-General GU Jun-think the past two years detergent industry happen one after another controversial incident detection standards. The State shall formulate the detergent of the mandatory standards, “the standards are minimum standards for the industry, each type of washing powder are the minimum threshold to enter the market, then in the future the quality of supervision and inspection process have all recognized criteria. “(07-12-10)
Tags: , , ,