Question:
I would like to ask, under the overpass, traffic lights are changing the law is, is not unified? For instance, traveling from west to east to the junction to turn right. Green turn right, the last-designate of the pedestrian crossing from north to south of the light is red or green ah?
my car with his car battery with rubbing. I have full responsibility for the traffic police contractors that want to turn right straight. If it is straight from the red light running, then how the contractor?
Confirmation has come out of the accident can change the re-trial? Even if the needs of the junction surface of the monitor can then call as evidence?
add: there is no right to turn right when the turn signal to turn right at any time. Have the right turn signal, then according to some traffic lights show.
there is the law of the lights. Lights turn right, I turn right from west to east to south, from north to south and that the sidewalk is a red light or green light, this is very important.

Answer:
overpass west to east from the traffic lights, is not there turn left, go straight, turn right three arrows?

not tell you very clearly, but say “lights turn right time”, that is, turn right by the traffic lights control, we have to wait for the green light when the red light change to come through? ?

in that direction from your point of view, your car to turn right, may be: a green light to turn left + right turn or straight + the green light turn right, turn left and basically does not prohibit the straight, but a separate right turn allowed the green light to such a situation. +

turn left turn right into the green, you can turn right into the car, from north to south of the non-motor vehicles and pedestrians there is a red light is not green, or else will affect the car turn left, non-motor vehicle and pedestrians have to cross the road into the non-motorized Road, turn right, it will affect the cars. straight +

the green light turn right, the same token, from north to south of the non-motor vehicles and pedestrians there is a red light. So

of car polish and car battery, do you suspect him of red light running.

If this is the case, you turn right, he straight, but because of red light running, the responsibility of the other side. In fact, there is another

case, the sidewalk from north to south is the green light last few seconds, he can be adopted, half gone, but the red light changed, and can continue through, this does not闯红灯count. And automotive, as yellow light can be changed just at the junction of the, ah, may the other direction is green, and in that direction have already started the car, but you can continue, and this is not the red light running.

like this is the case, so we should go straight turn right, you have responsibility.

three arrows, if not traffic lights, turn right into the car and there is no relationship between the traffic lights, turn right into the can has been. You can turn right when the red light, but he can also be straight, but also such a situation, you have to let him. When the green light to turn right, he may be a red light running, or it may be when the green light did not pass through the in, so no red light running is not very good for Chuang determined. Monitor

so, do not know if the two directions of traffic lights can be photographed at the same time, if it is law and order with the probe, the general in the police station and have a good understanding of people, you can go and see, and may be useful to change the fines imposed by traffic police . If it is traffic control aspects of the probe, such a ruling, they certainly will not easily let you see. They view the probe was conducted in an illegal and criminal activities and serious road accident.

have a lot of the issue of the fines imposed by traffic police: car insurance, pedestrian, non-motor vehicle without insurance, in case an incident occurs, the responsibility of all those included in the driving side; the so-called people-oriented, the protection of the disadvantaged party, the responsibility of the driver award . These are unreasonable.

If you have sufficient evidence that it is the fault of the other side, of course, can change the traffic police to fine you.

wish you good luck ~!2008-05-22
问题:
我想先问一下，立交桥下的红绿灯变换是否都是有规律的，是不是统一的？比如我从西向东行驶到路口，要右转。右转绿灯亮，这个昨候的从北向南的人行横道的灯是红灯还是绿灯啊？
还有我车子与他的电瓶车相擦。交警判我全责，说右转要让直行。那如果是直行者闯红灯的话是怎么判？
已经出来的事故认定书能不能重新审请更改？还要如果的需要，路口的监视器的话面能不能调用作为证据？
问题补充：右转没有右转向灯的时候是可以随时右转。有右转向灯的话一定要按灯显示行驶。
还有就是灯亮的的规律。右转向灯亮的时候，我从西向东右转到南，那从北向南的人行道的灯是亮红灯还是绿灯，这个很重要的。

回答:
立交桥下从西向东的红绿灯，是不是有左转、直行、右转三个箭头的？

你讲的不是很清楚，但说“右转向灯亮的时候”，就是说右转由红绿灯控制的，一定要等红灯变绿灯的时候才能通过？？

从你那个方向来看，你的车要右转，可能是：左转＋右转的绿灯、或者直行＋右转的绿灯，基本上没有禁止左转和直行、却单独允许右转的绿灯这样一种情况的。

左转＋右转的绿灯亮时，你的车子可以右转，从北向南的非机动车和行人那边是红灯，不会是绿灯的，否则会影响汽车左转，非机动车和行人还要穿过马路进入非机动车道，这样会影响右转的汽车。

直行＋右转的绿灯亮时，一样的道理，从北向南的非机动车和行人那边是红灯。

所以汽车与电瓶车相擦，你怀疑他闯红灯。

如果是这种情况的话，你右转，他直行，但由于闯红灯，责任在于对方。

其实还有另外一种情况，从北向南的人行道的灯是绿灯还有{zh1}几秒钟的时候，他是可以通过的，走了一半，但变红灯了，可以继续通过，这不算闯红灯。和汽车一样，刚变黄灯可以通过路口的啊，可能另外方向已经是绿灯了，那个方向的汽车已经起步了，但你可以继续通过的，这不算闯红灯的。

像这种情况的话，右转就要让直行，你就有责任了。

如果不是三个箭头的红绿灯，那汽车右转和红绿灯就没有关系，一直可以右转的。红灯时你可以右转，但他也可以直行，也有这样一种情况的，你就得让他。绿灯时右转，他可能是闯红灯了，也可能是绿灯时没通过的在继续通过，所以闯没闯红灯不大好确定。

监视器的话，不知道两个方向的红绿灯能不能同时拍到，如果是治安用的探头，一般在派出所的，有认识的人的话，可以去看看的，或许对改变交警的判罚有用。如果是交管方面的探头，他们都这么判了，肯定不会轻易让你看的。他们查看探头是在有违法犯罪活动和严重交通事故的时候。

好多交警的判罚都有问题：汽车有保险，行人、非机动车没有保险，发生事故时，责任都算在开车的那一方；所谓的以人为本、保护弱势的一方，把责任判给驾驶员。这些都是不合理的。

如果你有充分的证据说明对方是过错方，当然可以改变交警对你的判罚。

祝你好运～！2008-05-22